Matti Pitkanen and
Seth on time
I was responding to
something he had written to Quantum Mind on the nature of time. I believe it
was the post at:
http://listserv.arizona.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind9812&L=quantum-mind&D=0&O=T&P=10767
Here is an edited
version of the entire dialogue:
[Matti]
The advances in
understanding of time (I hope that they are real) were triggered by some
question in the quantum mind discussion group. My basic problem was to
understand why the arrow of psychological time and why psychological time at
all: moments of consciousness correspond to quantum jumps between quantum
*histories*. In this framework one would expect that contents of conscious
experience are diffused over entire histories and the problem is to understand
how the time-localized component of CS [Conscious Selection] experience
results.
I had understood how
the concepts of conscious experience can be localized to a definite value of
geometric time for a particular experiencer (that is particular irreducible
part of conscious experience). I had also idea about how local arrow comes. But
this was not enough as I thought.
I did not realize
that basic difficulty was caused by my sticking to the common sense idea that
given moment of consciousness corresponds to *definite value of cosmological
time*: all experiencers of the universe live just this particular moment of
cosmic time about 10^11 years or so.
There is no need to
assume this!! Each moment of consciousness decomposes into separate conscious
experiences with values of psychological time ranging from zero to infinity.
The civilizations of geometric past still live and flourish and versions of me
come behind me in geometric time propagate as waves of free will. I live my
life again and again, rebirth happens roughly at 1950 again and again! (Unless
there is some kind of liberation from this time cycle of Karma!), Each life is
a little bit better by p-adic evolution (which was a second big discovery
during last half year).
[Barry]
This concept is
remarkably similar to something that Seth said in an unpublished early session.
Here is a quote from that session:
"Space and time
are constructions of ideas. They do not appear physically, as say a table or a
chair, yet they seem to define both a table and a chair, in that you cannot
easily conceive of a piece of furniture, for example, existing except in the
medium of space and time.
"The ideas of
space and time are constructed in different ways in various systems. In some
they appear as natural phenomena, for example as various classifications of
objects, in some as variations of sound or light. You find it exceedingly
difficult to consider existence at all without space and time, yet basically
consciousness is independent of both.
"The ideas of
space and time emerge only when consciousness adopts camouflage, only when it
becomes wedded, in other words, with a physical type existence. Time and space
are both creations of consciousness, in other words, and vehicles of its
expression.
"Matter is a
classification. As explained in my book, various levels of concentration can be
used as platforms leading you out of focus, into other time schemes. Time is
like color. You are merely focusing upon one hue. (10:39)
"Your present
civilization and the ‘old’ Sumerian (spelled) civilization, exist at once, then
simultaneously, but to speak to you about these I must use a time sequence you
understand. If it were understood that these civilizations exist at once, then
you would not be so surprised that they ‘were’ able to build structures that
you cannot build in your now.
"Your now and
their now exists now.
"In the present
physical area in which it seems to you that a physical civilization once
existed, that civilization still exists. You cannot meet it though you stand at
the same spot, because of the ideas of time that separate you. The civilization
in flower, and the ruins, coexist. The living ancient Sumerians pass the modern
tourists without seeing them, even as the tourists walk in the middle of the
old Sumerian marked places and see only ruins.
"Much of this
could be explained n mathematical equations that presently escape you. Your own
consciousness is contemporary with the ancient Sumerians (spelled) as well as
with your current selves in your terms.
(10:46) "Think
of countries existing simultaneously now on your planet. There are differences
in language and culture, and it takes a certain amount of earth time to travel
through space to visit them. In the same way all times exist at once, with
their peculiar customs, and in your terms within the same space that you know.
"You have
learned how to make roads through space, but not through time on a conscious
level. There are intersections n time and space, however, that you have not
recognized. I am speaking in your terms, hopefully to make this simpler. (Pause.)
Times exist then as surely as places. You think of time as moving toward
something, and of space as relatively stable.
"It does not
occur to you then that you can get to times, as you can get to places. (Pause
at 10:53.) All of this is highly difficult to explain. I do not mean for
example that time, each moment, is a finished and done thing to be visited. While
time is not moving in a particular direction, in your terms, each moment
explodes outwards, or expands outward in all directions.
"Space and time
as you understand them ripple through each other. They do not behave as you
think they do, however. Presently you understand your existence only as it
intrudes into three dimensions. Its own activity is in many other dimensions
however.
"The Sumari,
therefore, appear in or intrude into the three dimensional system from other
dimensions.
"Now you may
take a break or end the session as you prefer."
Rob: "We’ll take
the break."
___________________________________
[Matti]
Therefore subjective
world is really 4-dimensional! It is only various components of conscious
experience, which contain mainly information about 3-dimensional section of
quantum history and create the common sense illusion that all other conscious
beings live the same time. It is the 'timelike' counterpart of pre-Keplerian
illusion about Earth as the center of the Universe: space is only replaced with
time in this illusion.
It is somewhat frustrating
to find , that all consciousness theory builders having some name share this common
sense belief (to say nothing about physicists) and refuse to spend a second for
pondering the possibility that it might be illusion. This despite the logical contradictions
implied by time=constant snapshot world view in quantum theory.
[Barry]
Your analogy to the
geocentric world view is really quite apt. Then we saw the earth as the center
of a small universe, now we see the universe as extending to physical infinity.
Unfortunately we still see time as starting with the big bang and ending with
entropic heat death. We are only beginning to expand our awareness to where it
can encompass infinite time. Only a few are even beginning to expand their
comprehension of time "horizontally" to include infinite probable
realities.
Here is some more
Seth stuff on time:
Time quotes from Seth
Speaks
The soul's
perceptions are not dependent upon time, because time is a physical camouflage
and does not apply to nonphysical reality.
Time does not consist
of a series of moments, one before the other, though you perceive it now in
that fashion. Events are not things that happen to you. They are materialized
experiences formed by you according to your expectations and beliefs.
There was no
beginning and there will be no end.
What you perceive of
time is a portion of other events intruding into your own system, often
interpreted as movement in space, or as something that separates events - if
not in space, then in a way impossible to define without using the concept of
time.
What separates events
is not time, but your perception. You perceive events "one at a
time." Time as it appears to you is instead a psychic organization of
experience. The seeming beginning and end of an event, the seeming birth and
death, are simply other dimensions of experience as, for example, height,
width, weight
Though it seems to
you that reincarnational existences involve past and future events, they are
existences parallel or adjacent to your own present life and consciousness. Other
aspects of your greater entity exist, relatively speaking, about or around
these.
There is interaction
between you and your reincarnational selves constantly, . . . there is
"constant action across the board."
Time Quotes from
"The 'Unknown' Reality"
At 9:45 PM 2/27/74,
Seth said:
Now: Basically, the
cell's comprehension straddles time as you think of it. Period.
Mankind's
consciousness, however, experimented along time-specific lines. As he developed
along those lines, various biological and mental methods of selectivity and
discrimination were utilized. When in historic terms mankind became aware of
memory, and recalled his past as a past in your terms, it was possible for him
to confuse past and present. Vivid memories, out of context but given immediate
neurological validity, could compete with the brilliant focus necessary in his
present.
Though the past is
actually quite as immediate, alive, and creative as the present is, man made
certain adjustments, on several layers, that would focus definite distinctions
and set past and present experience apart. While your particular kind of
consciousness was developing, it began to intensify selectivity, to concentrate
specifically in a small area of activity while blocking out other data. This
was necessary because the particular kind of physical manipulation of corporal
existence required instant physical response to immediately present stimuli.
(9:55.) Such
selectivity and specialization therefore represented a pertinent method, as
consciousness familiarized itself with earthly experience. Hunters had to
respond at once to the present situation. In time terms, the
"present" animal had to be killed for food—not the "past"
animal. That animal—the past one—existed as surely as the one presently
perceived, yet in man's context, physical action had to be directed to a highly
specific area, for physical survival depended upon it.
(Pause, and slowly:)
The cells' basic innocence of time discrimination had to be bypassed. At deeply
unconscious levels the neurological structure is more highly adaptable than it
appears. Adjustments were made, therefore. Basically, the neurological
structure responds to both past and future data Biologically, then, such activity
is built-in. The specialized "new" kind of consciousness in one body
had to respond pinpoint fast. Therefore it focused upon only one series of
neurological messages.
(As Seth, Jane was
enunciating the material very carefully, almost syllable by syllable, as though
to give me time to write it down without error. Her diction in trance is
usually excellent, though; it's not often that I have to ask her to repeat a
word or phrase.)
These became more and
more biologically prominent, so that man's consciousness rode them, or leaped
upon them. These particular pulses or messages became the biologically and
mentally accepted ones. They were clued into sense perception, then. These pulses
or messages became the only official data that, translated into sense perception,
formed physical reality. This selectivity gave an understandable line of
reference from interior to exterior existence.
(10:10. Deliberately
but intently:) Other quite-as-valid messages were ignored. They became, while
present, biologically invisible. The cells still reacted to these otherwise
neglected pulses, as they needed data from both the past and future to maintain
the body's balance in "the present." The necessity for immediate
conscious exterior action at a "definite" point of intersection with
events was left to the emerging ego consciousness.
While the cells
required future and past data, and used it to form from that invisible tension
the body's present corporal reality, the same kind of information could be a
threat then to the ego consciousness, which could be overwhelmed. Within the
corporal structure, however, there are indeed messages that leap too quickly or
too slowly from your viewpoint to allow for any physical response. In that way
cellular comprehension is allowed its free flow; but the selectivity mentioned
(in sessions 682-3) bypasses such information, so that it does not conflict
with present sense data requiring physical action in time.
Other pulses,
carrying messages, are quite as valid as those that you perceive and physically
react to. Again, the cells respond to those constantly. The body, as mentioned
(in the 685th session) is an electromagnetic pattern, poised in a web of
probabilities, experienced as corporal at an intersection point in space and
time.
When man, speaking in
your terms of history, began to experiment with memory, there were innumerable
instances where the emerging ego consciousness did not distinguish clearly
enough between the past and present, as you understand them.
The past, in the
present, would appear so brilliantly that man could not react adequately in
circumstances of time that he had himself created. The future was blocked,
practically speaking (long pause), to preserve freedom of action and to
encourage physical exploration, curiosity, and creativity. With memory,
however, mental projections into the future were of course also possible so
that man could plan his activities in time, and foresee probable results:
"Ghost images" of the future probabilities always acted as mental stimuli
for physical explorations in all areas, and of all kinds.
____________________________________
Please note that this
passage ties together the concept of microtubule CS from both past and future
as well as probable or multiple realities. It gives an "evolutionary"
reason for our present lack of awareness regarding future and past perceptions.
Though Seth uses the term "cell" it is obvious that he is talking
about cellular structures as well.
In an earlier session
in The Unknown Reality, Seth described the conscious selection from probable
realities a bit further:
Body is also pattern
Period. While the material that composes it changes constantly, the pattern
maintains its own integrity. The form is etched in space and time, and yet the
pattern itself exists outside of that framework also—the body is a projection,
therefore, into the three-dimensional field.
The consciousnesses
of the cells within it, however, are eternal. The physical framework, then, is
itself composed of immortal stuff. The projection in time and space may
disappear, in your terms, wither and die. The main identity continues to exist,
even as the consciousnesses of millions of cells still exist that at one time
were part of the body.
(A one-minute pause
at 9:59.)
While inhabited by
the usual human consciousness, the living body operates as an intense focus
point. The conglomeration of consciousnesses within it on all levels focuses
its own network of communication. This private network is connected to all
others like it. There are levels of interaction then simply between all bodies,
electromagnetically and biologically. The network is more far-reaching than
that, however. Not only can all cells respond to each other, but their mass
activity triggers even higher centers of consciousness to respond to a given
set of world conditions, rather than to other quite-as-legitimate world
conditions that do not fit the accepted pattern. Probabilities to some extent,
then, are determined along cellular lines. This should be obvious.
(A long pause, one of
many, at 10:07.) The body's very structure will in itself set patterns for the
kinds of probabilities that can be practically experienced. The source-reality
out of which all else springs is never predetermined—that is, predestined, or
even set. The universe in any terms is always being created. Period.
When consciousness is
being specified, it always sees itself at the center of its world. All
specifications of consciousness and all phenomenal appearances occur when the
basic units of consciousness, the CU's [Consciousness Units, might correspond
to quantum foam], emerge into EE [Electromagnetic Energy] units, and hence into
the dimensions of actuality in your terms. Your mainly accepted normal
consciousness is within the matter of your body, and through it—the body—you
view your world. There is nothing to prevent you from viewing your body from a
standpoint outside of it, except that you have been taught that consciousness
is imprisoned within the flesh.
________________________________
In another section of
the same book Seth talks about a sort of hereditary "back action"
from the future:
For example: It is
truer to say that heredity operates from the future backward into the past,
than it is to say that it operates from the past into the present. Neither
statement would be precisely correct in any case, because your present is a
poised balance affected as much by the probable future as the probable past.
At no time, as a
rule, is your body not here to you. Your experience seems centered within it,
with the rest of the world safely outside. However, the particular selectivity
of your kind of consciousness rides over lapses that you do not recognize. In a
manner of speaking, your bodies blink off and on like lights. Their reality
fluctuates, from your standpoint. For that matter, so does the physical
universe.
You can understand
what is meant by saying that your consciousness fluctuates—for each individual
is aware of various intensities and concentrations. You are more alert, or, in
your terms, more conscious on some occasions than others. Now the same applies
to these units of consciousness—and to atoms, molecules, electrons, and other
such phenomena. The world literally blinks off and on. This reality of
fluctuation in no way bothers your own feeling of consistency, however. The
"holes (spelled) of nonexistence" are plugged up by the process of
selectivity. This process chooses significances then, again, around which
experience is built, and around which "life" is felt. The very
sensations of one kind of life then automatically set up barriers against other
such "world-schemes" that do not correlate with their own.
It is impossible for
you to examine an atom, a cell, or anything else except in your now. Period.
Because your sense experience follows a time pattern that you can understand,
then you take it for granted that a cell, for example, is the result of its
past, and that its present condition arises from the past. The fetus grows into
an adult, not because it is programmed from the past, but because it is to some
extent precognitively aware of its probabilities, and from the
"future" then imprints this information into the past structure.
From your viewpoint,
however, an examination of a cell will not show you that, but only its present
condition. It should appear obvious from what I am saying that neither future
nor past is predetermined. From your platform of poised now-experience, You
alter both the past and the future, and that alteration, that change, that
action, causes your point of immediate sense life.
(Long pause.) The
precious privacy of your existence, and indeed of your universe, is all the
more miraculous, so to speak, precisely because its probable reality emerges
from an infinite field of probabilities, each forever inviolate. (Long pause.)
It is important that these ideas be considered.
You cannot separate
your beliefs about reality from the reality that you experience. That is, your
beliefs about reality form it. Your ideas about what is possible and what is
not possible are reflected in all areas.
It is almost
impossible to begin with concepts of one isolated universe, one self at the
mercy of its past, one time sequence, and end up with any acceptable theory of
a multi-dimensional soul or godhead that is anything else but a glorified
personified concept of what you think man is.
Not only do your
metaphysics and sciences suffer, but your daily experience as a human being is
far less than it could be. There are, then, probabilities quite present, and
for that matter biologically practical, that would allow for a change in
individual consciousness so great as literally to propel the race into another
level of experience entirely. As in your terms the cavemen ventured out into
the daylight of the earth, so there is a time for man to venture out into a
greater knowledge of his subjective reality, to explore the dimensions of
selfhood and go beyond the small areas of himself in which he has thus far
found shelter.
These quotes are from
"The Unknown Reality" by Jane Roberts.
[Matti]
I must say that
similarities between time concepts of Seth and TGD are amazing. I am totally
convinced that doing good science is to achieve higher states of consciousness
and to translate them to the existing language. Jane has used language of
poetry and I have used language of mathematics. If my own view is correct (I
hope that I am the lucky one: all prophets in qmind are absolutely certain that
they have found the final truth!(:-)) , then I must conclude that the deepness
of insights represented in Seth overcomes totally that of the models in
fashion.
*******
[Barry]
This concept is
remarkably similar to something that Seth said in an unpublished early session.
Here is a quote from that session:
"Space and time
are constructions of ideas. They do not appear physically, as say a table or a
chair, yet they seem to define both a table and a chair, in that you cannot
easily conceive of a piece of furniture, for example, existing except in the
medium of space and time.
****
[Matti ]
I do not agree here
completely. I believe that geometric spacetime is real. What I regard as a construction
is the idea about subjective time development as time=constant snapshot
shifting gradually in future direction. This standard picture of physicists I
regard as simply wrong.
*********
[Barry new]
Seth is not saying
that geometric spacetime is not real but rather that physical reality is
composed of mind stuff.
[MP]
I agree in the sense
that I believe physical reality to be composed of mind stuff in the sense that
quantum states=quantum histories=objective realities can be regarded as
'ideas'. They are not conscious however: conscious mind is associated with
quantum jumps between 'ideas'.
[Barry quoting Seth]
"Your present
civilization and the ‘old’ Sumerian civilization, exist at once, then
simultaneously, but to speak to you about these I must use a time sequence you
understand. If it were understood that these civilizations exist at once, then
you would not be so surprised that they ‘were’ able to build structures that
you cannot build in your now.
[Matti]
The talk about
coexisting civilizations was really amazing. I have used exactly the same metaphor
about civilizations of future and past co-existing simultaneously with us consciously.
Simultaneity is however with respect to subjective time, not geometric time (of
course).
**********
[Barry continuing
Seth quote]
"Your now and
their now exists now."
*********
[Matti]
All really deep and
new ideas look paradoxical because they must be expressed using the language of
existing world view I think that the paradoxical language used by Seth when
talking about time results basically from the fact that there are basically
*two* times. The geometric time of physicists and the subjective time measured
by quantum jumps occurred. There is also the psychological time, which exists
only under some conditions (when contents of conscious experience are
concentrated around single value of geometric time), and which Seth actually
talks about later. When one realizes the presence of two times, the paradox
disappears but poetry is lost.
***********
[MP]
Just a comment. I
learned from my elder son, who is Stephen King fan, that his time concept
resembles that of 'cosmology of consciousness'! If my son is right, King has
build his entire production around the idea that civilizations of past live
still in some sense. It would be interesting to know how many writers have
proposed this time concept.
[Barry new]
Seth has a great
metaphor for this concept. I have attached an excerpt from The Unknown Reality
Volume 2 which uses this metaphor. Here is a short introduction to this
metaphor:
As all physical
matter is connected in any particular time, or era, so the individual
consciousness of each being is also connected with every other. This applies to
all consciousnesses as you understand that term.
A mountain is
composed of many layers of rock that serve, as you think of it, as its
foundation. The top of the mountain represents the present to you, and the
tiers of rock beneath stand for the past. The mountain itself is not any one of
those rock layers that seemingly compose it, however. There is a relationship
between the mountain and those strata, but the term "mountain" is one
that you have applied. In greater terms the mountain and all of its components
exist at once, of course. You can examine the various levels of rock structure.
Geologists can tell when, in terms of time, certain sedimentary deposits
formed. The rocks themselves still exist in the geologists' present time, or
they could not make such an examination. The mountain would not be a mountain
without that "foundation." Again, however, it is not any one of those
rock layers.
Now In somewhat the
same manner, the self that you know is the mountain, and the rock layers
forming it are past lives.
You are not any of
those past selves, even though they are a part of the history of your being.
They are themselves in their own space and time. They exist simultaneously with
your own life, even as the strata of rock exist simultaneously with the mountain.
Your present
existence, however, is highly related to those other levels of selfhood. Now
what happens at the top of the mountain affects all that goes on below, and so
everything that you do affects those other realms of selfhood, and there is an
interchange that occurs constantly. Physical conditions may be quite different
in the valley, in the foothills of the mountain, and at its top.
Session 727 519
The very climate and
vegetation may vary considerably and yet all life and vegetation within the
area are interrelated. Each layer of life that composes the mountain—
("Is 'life' the
word you want used there?" This is one of the few times I've interrupted
Seth during his presentation of "Unknown" Reality.)
Yes . . . life that
composes the mountain is equally valid and important, and each concentrates
upon its own reality at its own level.
Like the mountain,
therefore, you have a history in terms of the present that is yours, and yet
not yours. It does not control you, for you alter it with each thought and
action, even as each motion at the mountain's top affects its base. The layers
at the bottom, however, are also constantly changing, so that the whole area is
a gestalt of relatedness.
(Pause at 9:43.) In
the physical world, islands, valleys, plateaus, continents and oceans all have
their place, and serve to form the physical basis of your reality. Each blade
of grass helps form the life of the earth. So each consciousness, however
minute, is indispensable in its place and time.
Each flower on a
hillside looks out with its own unique vision of the world, and each
consciousness does the same thing, fulfilling a position impossible for any
other consciousness to fulfill.
(Most emphatically:)
In terms of time only, there is an archaeological meaning that is hidden within
your own nature. To discover it you look "down" through the levels of
your own being, there to find the layers of selfhood that in your world
represent the past history of yourself, from which you emerged. You are not
those selves psychically, however, any more than you are your mother's or your
father's in physical terms. You are as different from those reincarnational
selves, therefore, as you are from your parents, though you share certain backgrounds
and characteristics.
It is easy for you to
see how you affect your parents in your lifetime, though they are older than
you. In the same way, however, you affect your reincarnational family.
(Pause.) When it
rains, water rushes in great exuberant gushes down the sides of the mountain,
bringing life and vitality to all of its parts. In somewhat the same way, your
own experiences flow down and into the cracks and crevices of all the other
times and centuries that compose your present lifetime.
[MP]
This is a really
beautiful metaphor. I talked myself about 4-dimensional society with the next door
neighbor of mine being me but this is something more convincing.
[Barry continuing
Seth quote]
(With a smile.) I
have a surprise for you, however, for I have been speaking of you as the top of
our mountain—for it certainly seems to you that you are at the top, so to
speak. Instead, your vantage point and your focus is such that you cannot turn
your head
520 Section
6
to look higher.
Perhaps you are like a fine sunny cliff on the side of the mountain, jutting
out, looking down to the valley beneath, not realizing that the mountain itself
continues [up] beyond you. You are, then, in the position of any of the other
levels "beneath," many also thinking themselves the top of the
mountain, looking only downward.
You are convinced
that you cannot see the future, and this means—in terms of our analogy, at
least—that you cannot look upward beyond your own time. While that is the case,
you will always think of reincarnation as occurring in the past.
(Very definitely at
10:02.) Think instead of strata of being, each simultaneously occurring.
Physically the human fetus bears a memory of its "past." In your
terms, it travels through the stages of evolution before attaining its human
form. It attains that form, however, because it responds to a future time,2 a
future self not as yet physically created.
"In the present
physical area in which it seems to you that a physical civilization once
existed, that civilization still exists. You cannot meet it though you stand at
the same spot, because of the ideas of time that separate you. The civilization
in flower, and the ruins, coexist. The living ancient Sumerians pass the modern
tourists without seeing them, even as the tourists walk in the middle of the
old Sumerian marked places and see only ruins.
"Much of this
could be explained n mathematical equations that presently escape you. Your own
consciousness is contemporary with the ancient Sumerians (spelled) as well as
with your current selves in your terms.
**
[Matti]
I hope that it does
not escape anymore(:-)!
********
[Barry new]
This is my hope as
well.
[Barry continuing
Seth quote]
(10:46) "Think
of countries existing simultaneously now on your planet. There are differences
in language and culture, and it takes a certain amount of earth time to travel
through space to visit them. In the same way all times exist at once, with
their peculiar customs, and in your terms within the same space that you know.
****
[Matti]
I remember two lively
dreams [actually I believed during this dream (or what I should call it) that I
am completely awake]. The people who had lived for decades ago in my small
apartment became visible. They were still living their lives. This was strange
and terrifying. In the second dream I woke up to the sounds coming from
outside: a group of laughing merry people walking and dancing in the street.
The shock was absolute certainty of these people belonging to past. I have certainly
pondered a lot about the message of these dreams but have not been able to make
the decisive step to 'cosmology of consciousness'.
*********
[Barry new]
There are many
"Practice Elements" in Unknown Reality which can be used to help
learn greater conscious dream control as well as greater understanding and
control of these types of non-local time interactions.
[Matti]
Therefore subjective
world is really 4-dimensional! It is only various components of conscious
experience, which contain mainly information about 3-dimensional section of
quantum history and create the common sense illusion that all other conscious
beings live the same time. It is the 'timelike' counterpart of pre-Keplerian
illusion about Earth as the center of the Universe: space is only replaced with
time in this illusion.
It is somewhat
frustrating to find , that all consciousness theory builders having some name
share this common sense belief (to say nothing about physicists) and refuse to spend
a second for pondering the possibility that it might be illusion. This despite
the logical contradictions implied by time=constant snapshot world view in
quantum theory.
[Barry]
Your analogy to the
geocentric world view is really quite apt. Then we saw the earth as the center
of a small universe, now we see the universe as extending to physical infinity.
Unfortunately we still see time as starting with the big bang and ending with
entropic heat death. We are only beginning to expand our awareness to where it
can encompass *infinite time*(!!). Only a few are even beginning to expand
their comprehension of time "horizontally" to include infinite
probable realities.
[Matti]
One of the
discoveries during last half year was infinite primes and the realization that
each moment of consciousness decomposes into subexperiences with values of
psychological time ranging from zero to infinity. In particular, literally
*infinite* (see above) values of psychological time are involved.
Assuming that
geometric time development and evolution by quantum jumps correspond to each
other roughly, this means that the experiencers of infinite future must be God
like as compared to us! Gods exist!
What is needed in
order to participate to this kind of experience is to get quantum entangled
with this kind of experiencer (do not ask me how!(:-)). Perhaps the religious
and mystic experiences, and the experience of the Jane in particular, result
from this kind of quantum entanglement. But certainly, Jane must express her
experience using the world view and language of her culture and this means that
the language used is necessary paradoxical and that these experiences can give
rise to wrong interpretations.
For me the discovery
of hierarchy of consciousnesses was very satisfying since the theory of
infinite numbers has been regarded as mathematized theology, in which the
ultimate largest, never reachable infinity is the equivalent of God.
*******
[Barry new]
The "how"
for this kind of experience is well described in the sacred literature of yoga
and also in the Seth books. In a sense the ancient Hindus had a science of
consciousness. Their procedures were repeatable and outcomes were predictable. Isn't
this the core of science?
[MP]
It certainly is.
Higher states of consciousness can be achieved by methods having description in
standard language of science. Of course, the idea that we could have technology
of enlightenment sounds banal but it could exist. Subject person is in 'think
tank' in sensory deprivation and sounds with slightly differing frequencies are
fed in both ears. Often 'enlightened' states and religious experiences result. From
the point of view of materialistic scientist conclusion is obvious: since
religious experiences can be produced copiously so that they differ in no ways
from pain in the neck.
From my point of
view, since the method eliminates sensory input, it could make possible
entanglement with 'civilizations of future'. Under normal conditions this kind
of quantum entanglement would be quite too weak and strong form of negentropy
maximization principle would favour ordinary conscious experiences. What is the
role of the sound (Om!) is mystery to me.
[Barry continuing
Seth quotes]
The soul's
perceptions are not dependent upon time, because time is a physical camouflage
and does not apply to nonphysical reality.
Time does not consist
of a series of moments, one before the other, though you perceive it now in
that fashion. Events are not things that happen to you. They are materialized
experiences formed by you according to your expectations and beliefs.
****
[MP]
I would go even further and say that 'I' is
created by these experiences: only a sequence of experiences exist subjectively
and at fundamental level no continuous streams of consciousness exist. CSC idea
leads to homunculus idea and this in turn to the paradox since one must assume
infinite series of homunculi inside homunculi. Of course, the idea about CSC is
a good approximation in practices of everyday life.
[Matti]
I would say that
geometric time does not consists of series of moments. Subjective time
consists. And only under special conditions moments of subjective time
correspond to an increasing series of geometric time.
*****
[Barry new]
Early in the Seth
sessions he often noted that his expression of these concepts were limited by
Jane's experience and vocabulary probably in much the same way as you are
limited in what you can say to me by my lack of understanding of the language
of mathematics.
[Jane]
There was no beginning
and there will be no end.
*******
[Matti]
This idea is
extremely deep. How I express it is as follows. Geometric time has beginning:
the moment of big bang. *Subjective* time however cannot have no beginning:
there can be no first quantum jump.
The motivation for
arguing this is that this would lead to a deep philosophical problem: what was
the first quantum state (history) and quantum jump between histories concept
solves this problem if their is no first quantum jump. In standard physics the
problem of initial state is very acute (the only known, very unsatisfactory, solution
is to say that initial state was what it was because otherwise we would not be
here).
The p-adic evolution
implies that the p-adic prime characterizing the 3-surfaces gradually
increases. If infinite number of quantum jumps has already occurred, this prime
must be infinite! This led to the construction of the theory of infinite
primes. The great surprise was that this theory can be regarded as a repeated
quantization of quantum field theory such that the many particle states of
previous level become single particle states at the new level. Also the basic
structures of quantum measurement theory and TGD inspired theory of
consciousness have counterparts in this construction (in particular
subsystem-complement decomposition). So, this innocent sounding state
"There was no beginning and there will no end" has given rise to a
new branch of mathematics!(:-)
[Barry new]
Seth often talked
about how our time perspective pushes us into looking at things from a
sequential, cause and effect prejudice. Mystics strive to locate their
consciousness in the "eternal present" in order to get out of this
cause and effect world. The speak of the cause and effect world viewpoint as
being tied to the wheel of karma.
[MP]
I have been reading
neuropsychology (my ambitious aim now is to try to build coherent and concrete
overall view about how quantum brain works) and it seems that left brain is
really the creator of time order. Perhaps right hemisphere has better ability
to get entangled with 'civilizations of future' and have timeless experiences.
[Barry continuing
Seth quotes]
What you perceive of
time is a portion of other events intruding into your own system, often
interpreted as movement in space, or as something that separates events - if
not in space, then in a way impossible to define without using the concept of
time.
What separates events
is not time, but your perception. You perceive events "one at a
time." Time as it appears to you is instead a psychic organization of
experience. The seeming beginning and end of an event, the seeming birth and
death, are simply other dimensions of experience as, for example, height,
width, weight
[Matti]
Psychological time
defined as the value of geometric time around which contents of conscious
experience are concentrated leads to this picture.
********
[Seth quote]
Though it seems to
you that reincarnational existences involve past and future events, they are
existences parallel or adjacent to your own present life and consciousness. Other
aspects of your greater entity exist, relatively speaking, about or around
these.
[Matti]
This was also one of
the amazing conclusions I ended up in cosmology of consciousness.
*****
[Barry new]
That is how I can
tell you are on the right track. I certainly can't tell it by my pathetic
understanding of mathematics. :-)
[Barry continuing
Seth quotes]
The past, in the
present, would appear so brilliantly that man could not react adequately in
circumstances of time that he had himself created. The future was blocked,
practically speaking (long pause), to preserve freedom of action and to
encourage physical exploration, curiosity, and creativity.
With memory, however,
mental projections into the future were of course also possible so that man
could plan his activities in time, and foresee probable results: "Ghost
images" of the future probabilities always acted as mental stimuli for
physical explorations in all areas, and of all kinds.
____________________________________
Please note that this
passage ties together the concept of microtubule CS from both past and future
as well as probable or multiple realities. It gives an "evolutionary"
reason for our present lack of awareness regarding future and past perceptions.
Though Seth uses the term "cell" it is obvious that he is talking
about cellular structures as well.
[Matti]
The picture about
gradual evolution of experiencers with contents located around single value of
geometric time is in accordance with TGD picture. I however believe that the
idea that our contents of conscious experience are localized around single
value of geometric time is partly an illusion. There is diffuse component
coming from entire quantum histories and this could give rise to intuition.
Also multimoments are possible. I could experience simultaneously with what I
call 'recent' also events from my childhood, youth. Perhaps old people who
return at the level of subjective experience to their childhood really live in
their childhood.
********
[Barry new]
In some of the Seth
books Jane and her husband relate their personal examples of this type of multi-moment
experience. Her fiction books about Oversoul 7 give a wonderful account of how
old folks loose their firm connection to linear time.
In an earlier session
in The Unknown Reality, Seth described the conscious selection from probable
realities a bit further:
Body is also pattern
Period. While the material that composes it changes constantly, the pattern
maintains its own integrity. The form is etched in space and time, and yet the
pattern itself exists outside of that framework also The body is a projection,
therefore, into the three-dimensional field.
The consciousnesses
of the cells within it, however, are eternal. The physical framework, then, is
itself composed of immortal stuff. The projection in time and space may
disappear, in your terms, wither and die. The main identity continues to exist,
even as the consciousnesses of millions of cells still exist that at one time
were part of the body.
[Matti]
"The
consciousness of cells within it are eternal": a possible interpretation
is that geometric past still exists and have moments of consciousness. TGD
however predicts that this geometric past is subject to evolution since quantum
jumps between histories occur all the time.
********
[Barry new]
See the attached
document for Seth's discussion of this concept.
(A long pause, one of
many, at 10:07.) The body's very structure will in itself set patterns for the
kinds of probabilities that can be practically experienced. The source-reality
out of which all else springs is never predetermined—that is, predestined, or
even set. The universe in any terms is always being created. Period.
*****
[Matti]
Moment of
consciousness as replacement of old universe=quantum history with a new one is
just what TGD claims.
********
[Barry new]
I thought as much.
When consciousness is
being specified, it always sees itself at the center of its world. All
specifications of consciousness and all phenomenal appearances occur when the
basic units of consciousness, the CU's [Consciousness Units, might correspond
to quantum foam], emerge into EE [Electromagnetic Energy] units, and hence into
the dimensions of actuality in your terms. Your mainly accepted normal
consciousness is within the matter of your body, and through it—the body—you
view your world. There is nothing to prevent you from viewing your body from a
standpoint outside of it, except that you have been taught that consciousness
is imprisoned within the flesh.
________________________________
In another section of
the same book Seth talks about a sort of hereditary "back action"
from the future:
For example: It is
truer to say that heredity operates from the future backward into the past,
than it is to say that it operates from the past into the present. Neither
statement would be precisely correct in any case, because your present is a
poised balance affected as much by the probable future as the probable past.
*****
[Matti]
I would rather speak
of quantum jumps between quantum histories. The entire spacetime (which is
defined as 'quantum average spacetime') is replaced with a new one in each
quantum jump. For instance, each moment of consciousness I have changes also my
past and affects the life of civilizations there.
********
[Barry new]
The first explorers
of a new area get to name the geological features of the area. Sometimes when
two explorers explore simultaneously there is a dispute over which names will
be used.
At no time, as a
rule, is your body not here to you. Your experience seems centered within it,
with the rest of the world safely outside. However, the particular selectivity
of your kind of consciousness rides over lapses that you do not recognize. In a
manner of speaking, your bodies blink off and on like lights. Their reality
fluctuates, from your standpoint. For that matter, so does the physical
universe.
You can understand
what is meant by saying that your consciousness fluctuates—for each individual
is aware of various intensities and concentrations. You are more alert, or, in
your terms, more conscious on some occasions than others. Now the same applies
to these units of consciousness—and to atoms, molecules, electrons, and other
such phenomena. The world literally blinks off and on.
[Matti]
This could be interpreted
as a metaphor for quantum jumping. Given subsystem does not possess continuous
stream of consciousness but performs now and then quantum jump that is 'blinks'.
********
[Barry new]
Works for me.
[Jane Roberts quote]
This reality of
fluctuation in no way bothers your own feeling of consistency, however. The
"holes (spelled) of nonexistence" are plugged up by the process of
selectivity.
****
[Matti]
It is not possible to
be conscious of being not conscious.
******
[Barry new]
Buddhist/Taoist
concept of "no mind".