ORMUS Box Chemistry
It is obvious that no one
understands the chemistry of the
A monatom
(or diatom) is too small to be visible yet we clearly have a white (or gray or
red-brown) powder, which is visible. The particles of this powder are clearly
visible but, in the case of the white powder of gold and iridium, are not
easily divisible using strong acids. This would suggest that some very strong
chemical bonds are active in the visible white powder particles.
If chemical bonds are
holding these particles of pure gold together then they cannot be monatomic
gold. They cannot be diatomic gold either. How many gold atoms must be bound
together before you get a visible particle?
In one of his
un-transcribed lectures, David Hudson quotes from one of the scientific papers
he uses for reference. (I wish I had the exact quote and the lecture reference
but I don't and it might take days to find it.) The quote was probably from one
of the Physical Review papers on monatomic transition elements. As I recall,
the quote suggested that monatomic gold could only exist as a gas.
If this is true, what is it
that we see when we see a small white particle of ORMUS gold? What is the bond
that holds these particles together? Is it a chemical bond, a nuclear bond or
something we have never heard of? We obviously need a theory that will clarify
how these seemingly contradictory facts can all be true. The hypothesis, which
I would suggest might reconcile these contradictions, is that the bosonic unit (that is the monatom
or diatom) is not what we are seeing at all. Rather, what we are seeing is the
cage or box that the bosonic unit is held in.
I *believe* that virtually
all chemical manipulation of the unassayable ORMUS
elements is actually just manipulation of the particular molecular cage it is
in. If these elements are superconductors which exhibit diamagnetic properties
in water then they would have to be single "unit" superconductors
rather than matrix superconductors like we are used to. A single
"unit" superconductor would have to be a boson with fully paired
electrons AND fully paired nucleons as well.
The "preference"
that these elements seem to have for hanging out inside molecular cages could
be that these cages provide some shielding from magnetic and other forces. As
single "unit" superconductors they would tend to retreat from
magnetic fields into any structure which gave them some shielding from those
fields. My friend Jim noticed this when he found that a rubber-banded stack of
microscope slides would tend to collect ORMUS in the tight space between the
slides.
He took advantage of this
effect when he would put a sealed bottle of aluminum oxide desiccant beads in
the shielded container with his ORMUS products. He claims that these beads
provide a tight comfy place for the ORMUS to hang out and that the ORMUS
"gets into" the sealed container and changes the color of the
indicator beads with the factory seal on the bottle still intact. (I have seen
this happen.) The sealed bottle of desiccant beads actually gains weight as the
beads became saturated with ORMUS.
I would like to suggest
that the ORMUS affinity for tight spaces also holds as an affinity for the very
tight spaces inside molecules. While in this tight inner molecular space I
would expect the Meissner "field" to exercise some control over the
behavior and configuration of the molecule it is associated with.
Dr. Martin Chaplin who is
the Professor of Applied Science at
http://chem.skku.ac.kr/~wkpark/tutor/mirror/www.martin.chaplin.btinternet.co.uk/intro.html
These water molecules
would, in essence, be like molecular geodesic domes that would provide a nice
comfy inner space for the ORMUS unit to chill out. These water molecules with
their ORMUS resident would be available for other chemical bonds. When bonded
with hydroxide radicals they would become visible as a precipitate.
As I suggested before, the
ORMUS resident in the geodesic water molecule might exercise some control over
the structure and behavior of the entire molecule through subtle energetic forces
like the Meissner effect.
Is there any evidence that
such changes in the structure and behavior of water take place in nature?
Of course there is. We have
all seen pictures of Dr. Emoto's water crystals which
have been shaped by music, prayer, pollution or intent. "Structured
water" is THE buzzword of the new age water industry. Dr. Mae-Wan Ho
believes that the structuring of water is the basis of homeopathy. Here is a
quote from one of her articles on this subject:
In
the mid-1990s, quantum physicists Del Giudice and Preparata and other colleagues in
One
way in which "memory" might be stored in water is through the
excitation of long-lasting coherent oscillations specific to the substances in
the homeopathic remedy dissolved in water. Interaction of water molecules with
other molecules changes the collective structure of water, which would in turn
determine the specific coherent oscillations that will develop. If these become
stabilised and maintained by phase coupling between
the global field and the excited molecules, then, even when the dissolved substances
are diluted away, the water may still carry the coherent oscillations that can "seed"
other volumes of water on dilution.
The
discovery that dissolved substances form increasingly large clusters is
compatible with the existence of a coherent field in water that can transmit
attractive resonance between the molecules when the oscillations are in phase,
leading to clumping in dilute solutions. As the cluster of molecules increases
in size, its electromagnetic signature is correspondingly amplified, reinforcing
the coherent oscillations carried by the water. [http://www.i-sis.org.uk/water3.php]
In "
"Here we consider
three proposals in which ordered water may play a role in biological quantum
coherence essential for living systems and consciousness: 1) quantum optical
coherence in microtubule inner cores ("super-radiance" and
"self-induced transparency"); 2) cellular "vision"; 3)
isolation of microtubules from environmental decoherence."
The coherent changes that Hameroff and Ho are talking about must be controlled by
something. I am postulating that the ORMUS unit inside some water molecules is
the director of these coherent changes. I imagine that the ORMUS is like the
driver of a radio-dispatched taxi. Using this example, the coherent communication,
which we think happens between ORMUS elements, could give all of the taxi
drivers in a city instructions to change lanes at the same time.
When the
structure of water changes work is being done. The taxi drivers have to tug on
their steering wheels in order to change lanes. Where does the energy for this
work come from? How does the intent of someone praying over some water get
translated into a change of the structure of that water? How does a thought
make coherent changes in all of the water in the body? These are all mechanisms
that I think ORMUS theory can describe.
Several researchers who
have been doing ORMUS chemistry for a long time have noticed that there are
similarities between the chemical interactions of the metallic forms and the
chemical interactions of the ORMUS forms of these elements. They have also
noticed differences. While the same chemical reactions may occur with the ORMUS
form they are sometimes slower or less robust than the corresponding chemical
reaction with the metallic form. Sometimes many repetitions are required to get
the ORMUS form to do what we want it to do. This is quite noticeable in David
Hudson's patent.
In my hypothesis, the
difference would be accounted for because with the metals there is a direct
chemical interaction with the transition elements. With the ORMUS form, on the
other hand, the molecular cage that the ORMUS unit is in mediates the chemical
interaction. All of these chemical processes are taking place in some sort of
water-based solution. Since water is already the mediator of these chemical
processes it is not that big a stretch to postulate that the difference is that
the ORMUS form is in a water cage while the metallic form is not. The
"hydroxide" ORMUS precipitate would, in this model, be a way of aggregating ORMUS/water cages so that they could
be visibly isolated and concentrated.
This model might also
provide a greater understanding of other interesting properties of water. Water
is diamagnetic. This means that it is slightly repelled by magnetic fields. My
theory suggests a number of questions that might be answered empirically.
Is this diamagnetism a form
of superconductive magnetic levitation of the ORMUS/water cage molecule? Might
changes in the Meissner "field" bring about corresponding changes in
the structure of water? Does quantum coherence between the ORMUS units modulate
the Meissner effect?
I think that the
ORMUS/water-cage model provides a better framework for understanding the
chemistry of these elements.
I realize that the whole
theory of the nature of matter may need some work. August has pointed out that
it would be better to think of atoms as moving energy vortex fields and I agree
that this is more attractive than the theories which postulate a definite
division between solid matter and energy.