The
three main long-term researchers into the ORMUS materials
all report similar levitation effects. David Hudson has done the best
job of
documenting these effects in his patent. In order to establish a
definite
weight for the ORMUS form of iridium for the patent examiner,
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/patents/figures.htm
In David Hudson's patent demonstration experiment, which he reported in his various lectures, m-state iridium is heated to 850 degrees Celsius and its weight fluctuates between +575% and -25% of starting weight, the weight fluctuation could have been from magnetic or gravitational levitation. In his earlier lectures he postulated that this effect was magnetic levitation but in later presentations he claimed gravitational levitation.
Jim reported that some of his early experiences with the ORMUS materials resulted in something he called "fly ash" because it would fly away if one reached for it. Here are some comments from Jim on his "fly ash":
[JIM] The first one was some STP, muddy water from some samples that we took from up there and nuked them in his [T's] garage. We were still trying to figure out what's up. It did not work well. I mean we did get some gold but a lot of it that was extracted until we had the air cell going full force, when it evaporated and dried it turned into fly ash.
[BARRY] Why do you call it fly ash?
[JIM] Because when you'd reach for it, it would fly away.
[BARRY] What do you mean by that?
[JIM] When you reach for it, it moved away. That's it.
[BARRY] Where did it move?
[JIM] Anyplace it had to. Up the side of a jar, out of a pan. Unless it was wet you couldn't handle it.
_____________________________
[BARRY] You said you had some in a jar and you put your hand over the jar and it would float up to your hand?
[JIM] No. We had fly-ash as we called it in a jar. White . . .
[BARRY] Powder?
[JIM] Well, yea, it was kind of a flake. Little flakes that came off of wedges between the acrylic in the carbon air cell. We had some of those in a jar and you would reach for it and they would move to the other side of the jar and stuff. Especially in a garage wall lined with tools. You know iron tools hanging everywhere. It was pretty alive.
[BARRY] What do you mean by pretty alive?
[JIM] It moved a lot. By itself.
[BARRY] You could sit there and watch it move?
[JIM] Ah, it would be more like it was [?] [?] up and stuff like that.
[BARRY] Where was that?
[JIM] In T's garage sitting on the window sill. Probably still there. RH's garage had a bunch of that fly-ash, too, in it. Lots of it.
[BARRY] Now you have a sample . . . GC may have a sample of some of this stuff.
[JIM] I used to have some in a Popov Vodka bottle.
_______________________________________
[DM] Um, fly ash as I understand it, that forms in a dry area and it stays dry?
[JIM] The fly ash I don't really know too much about. Other than when the charcoal was damp we could pan it out, we could separate it and we could work with it. When it was dry, it was out of there. I mean it was out of there! You couldn't touch it, catch it. This is why I have a problem with somewhat of the monoatomic gold, you know, sitting around in the dry state, because the only way keep it was wet. Or what I suspect was monoatomic gold I should say.
[DM] Ok, well this fly ash you saved that day, that was collected at someplace within the column is that right? Below the charcoal in the column?
[JIM] In the charcoal. Yes, the fly ash was always in the charcoal or it was underneath the pan.
[DM] But it was wet?
[JIM] Yes, but it was always wet when we could accumulate it. Off the carbon it was always when it was damp, we would roll it around in the pan to get that.
__________________________________________
Jim
had these experiences in 1989, long before he had ever
heard of David Hudson or his materials. I saw some of the effects he
talked
about (also before I had ever heard of
When Jim started duplicating his earlier work, after hearing David Hudson's Portland lecture, he said that he produced more of the "fly ash" several times but I only saw this effect in one sample that Jim provided me with. I videotaped this material "jumping" away from a moving magnet several minutes of this videotape can be seen on the web at:
Magnetic
Levitation "Movie" by Barry Carter
levitate.avi
2.7mb
levitate.wmv
1.1mb
JumpingAu.wmv
2.49mb
The
first time I met the Essene (in May of 1997) he told me a
story about a levitation demonstration that
The Essene: Now I
went
to
Jim: Back to the fly ash.
Barry: Now the sheet had the m-state iridium in it?
The Essene: Right, exactly. And it was your aura that was actually picking the top table up.
Barry: Now, that m-state iridium wouldn't have been annealed?
The Essene: No.
Barry: So it was just the moving magnetic field that caused it to move?
The Essene: Your moving aura.
Barry: See this is the principle that this magnetic trap that Jim developed works under. It magnetically expels the m-state iridium, probably, from water. A lot of it's iridium and ah . . .
Jim: Run it through the turbine, spin the water over a magnetic field, the mono levitates against the water and you pull it out through wicking material that's hydrophobic.
The Essene: Same thing.
_____________________________________
After this experience, I would think that the Essene wanted to duplicate this effect. This is probably why he made up some pure m-state iridium in order to get a levitating disk. Here is the rest of the transcript of the Essene's account of his experiences with levitation:
Barry: That sort of brings up the next question. So how is it different?
The Essene: How did it fly?
Barry: How do they fly? What is the m-state iridium. Is it a gravitational shield?
The Essene: It's a gravitational shield. It won't allow the gravitational force to penetrate it.
Barry: Why?
The Essene: I really don't know.
Barry: Hm.
The Essene: But there is no force field of any kind [which can penetrate it].
Barry: Um hm.
________________________________________
Barry: What's the process, step by step, for getting m-state iridium into a levitating disk?
The Essene: All right, you take and make you up your m-state iridium fresh and you mix it into a ceramic clay--I use a porcelain clay--and mix it very, very thoroughly. The idea of annealing it is to spread the iridium molecules out so they are even because any place they're cluster they loose their spin.
Barry: You anneal it in what kind of a furnace?
The Essene: I use a toaster oven--a cupelling furnace. And the idea of it is that as you anneal it they push apart from each other and spread and they get even. This is the whole idea of annealing it. Now, iridium will not work if it is all together, it has to be set in an egg crate situation with something holding it apart.
Barry: A matrix.
The Essene: Yeah.
Barry: And your annealing oven is an electric oven?
The Essene: Yeah.
Barry: Will it work in a gas oven?
The Essene: Certainly.
Barry: You've done it that way too?
The Essene: No. When I was playing with that I didn't have my gas oven.
Barry: But you think it will work in a gas oven.
The Essene: I'm certain it will.
M: You made it in an egg carton?
The Essene: No, visualize in your mind how eggs set in a carton. Each one is separate. You're using the porcelain to isolate the iridium that way.
Barry: Particles.
Jim: Just like ferrite for a magnetic core.
Barry: How much iridium [is mixed into the clay]? You said about ten percent. Is that it?
The Essene: About it.
Jim: Can I buy some iridium from you?
The Essene: I'll give you some iridium sand and you can clean the damn stuff yourself.
Barry: M, do you want some iridium too?
M: Yeah.
___________________________________
In a sense, Jim's magnetic trap is a vivid demonstration of superconductive magnetic levitation. We literally spin water in a magnetic field and the superconducting portion of the water is concentrated by magnetic levitation. Jim has converted this portion into the platinum group metals and gold.
All
three researchers maintain that ordinary m-state
materials do not exhibit magnetic repulsion or levitation properties.
Each
researcher claims that they must be prepared in a special way in order
to
exhibit these properties.
David Hudson claims that the m-state he makes must be what he calls S-ORMEs which are distinct from ordinary ORMEs. The "S" in S-ORMEs stands for "superconducting". Here is the portion of his patent where he discusses this:
All of the electron pairs in their lowest energy state, unlike single electrons, can exist in the same quantum state. When that uniform quantum state is achieved, the electron pair can not only move with zero resistance around the monoatom, but also can move with zero resistance between identical ORMEs that are within approximately 20 A or less of each other with no applied voltage potential. When a macro system of high purity, single element ORME achieves long-range quantum electron pair movement, that many-body system according to the present invention is defined as an S-ORME system.
An S-ORME system does not possess a crystalline structure but the individual ORMEs will, over time, space themselves as uniformly as possible in the system. The application of a minimum external magnetic field will cause the S-ORME system to respond by creating a protective external field ["Meissner Field"] that will encompass all those S-ORMEs within the 20 A limit. As used herein, "minimum external magnetic field" is defined as a magnetic field which is below the critical magnetic field which causes the collapse of the Meissner Field. This field is generated by electron pair movement within the system as a response to the minimum applied magnetic field. The (Ir) S-ORME and the (Au) S-ORME systems have a minimum critical field (''Hc1'') that is below the earth's magnetic field. The minimum critical field for a (Rh) S-ORME is slightly above the earth's magnetic field. When the quantum flux flow commences, due to the minimum external magnetic field being applied, the doublet in the IR spectrum will disappear because electron pairs are no longer bound in a fixed position on the individual ORME monoatoms.
Once the externally applied field exceeds the level which overcomes the protective Meissner Field of the S-ORME system ( "Hc2" ), then any electrons moving between individual ORME atoms will demonstrate an ac Josephson junction type of response. The participating ORMEs will act as a very precise tuning device for electromagnetic emissions emanating from free electrons between ORMEs. The frequency of these emissions will be proportional to the applied external magnetic field. A one microvolt external potential will produce electromagnetic frequencies of 5x108 cycles per second. Annihilation radiation frequencies (about 1020 cycles per second) will be the limiting frequency of the possible emission. The reverse physical process of adding specific frequencies can generate the inverse relationship, i.e., a specific voltage will be produced for each specific applied frequency.
ORMEs can be reconverted to their constituent T-metals, but, as noted, are not identifiable as specific T-metals while in their ORME state. If a specific ORME is formed from a specific T-metal by using the procedure of this invention, it can only be confirmed by conventional analytical methods that the specific ORME was formed by reconstituting it as the T-metal.
_____________________________________
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/patents/ukpatent.htm
It
is clear, from the above, that
Jim and I have discussed this difference at length and we have concluded that there are two distinct m-state materials that we are working with. One would be the white precipitate that we get by bringing the pH of suitable liquid up to 10.78 or so. The other would be the oily liquid that we obtain from the magnetic trap or make from metal using ozone.
The best indicator that these are two distinct forms of the ORMUS elements is that one can take water which has been concentrated in a magnetic trap and run the Wet Method on it. If you compare the amount of precipitate from trap water to the amount of precipitate from source water you will find that both amounts are roughly the same. You do not get any more precipitate from trap water than from the water which was used to generate the trap water.
The oily trap water requires an entirely different process to convert it to metal than does the process to convert the precipitate to metal.
The fully Cooper paired diatoms would be immune to chemical manipulation because they would have no electrons available for valence bonding. But since they would be in a bosonic state, they would exhibit superconducting properties and could be manipulated using magnetic fields.
The annealing process that both Hudson and the Essene described as being necessary to get their respective materials to levitate would spin the atoms into a higher level of Cooper pairing.
Jim's
ozone process would get to the fully Cooper paired
diatoms in a single stage and his magnetic trap would simply
concentrate the
fully paired diatoms from air or water.
http://www.subtleenergies.com/ormus/research/paranorm.htm#SUPERCONDUCTIVITY
I have written an article on ORMUS and Ozone which can be found at:
http://www.subtleenergies.com/bmnfa/science/ORMUS/tw/Ozone.htm
Jim's
ozone technology generates a substantial amount of O6. I don't believe this
particular allotrope is recognized
yet, or it just barely has been, and satisfying the karmic cost of that
has
been the cause of the delay in discussing it for you.
This
is a conjugate molecule, which might be termed di-ozone, and consists
of six
oxygen helices, arranged at the corners a hexagonal cell, alternating
+-+-+-. It is reminiscent of the phalanx
of rocket engines at the base of a Delta launch vehicle.
In
oxides of the smaller members of the dumbbell atomic family, e.g.
sodium, the
oxygen spiral actually situates so it winds round or encircles the main
central
body of the dumbbell. From copper
upwards in the dumbbells, and also the bars group, it cannot do this
(oxygen is
too small in diameter for them to fit), and so contents itself with a
side-by-side arrangement, like a catamaran's outrigger. In the case of
dumbbells,
the oxygen and dumbbell axes always align in parallel.
For a heavy dumbbell atom like gold, it is
like a tiny man, dancing with a huge fat lady - there just isn't any
good way
to hold on, and this is (in simple terms), how gold resists oxidation
so well.
I
previously stated
>Simple
glancing thermal collisions knock
the monatomic atom
>into a
rapid spin, and that is how the
high spin [super
>deformed]
state leading to ORME
transition is most commonly
>achieved.
Now,
I may finally say some things about the particular ORMEs generating
mechanism
you are concerned with.
ORMEs
formation by ozonation is a mechanism that also occurs in Nature. A small but significant amount of O6 is produced by each lightning
strike, and also by highly
energetic photons in the upper troposphere, stratosphere and ionosphere. However, because of their very high
reactivity, the mean life of O6
molecules is
usually quite short, and so this mechanism generates far fewer ORMEs in
Nature
than geothermal processes, yet it is still an important process.
When
an O6 complex
approaches a gold dumbbell, something quite interesting happens. Oxygen is a highly vigorous atom taken
singly, but the dipolar forces from six synchronized oxygens, working
as a
team, is something exceptionally powerful, and in a class by itself. The powerful forces of this molecule are what
effects the transition of gold, etc., into a
superdeformed condition, and thence into the ORME state.
In
most cases, even when a single oxygen is
paired with a
dumbbell, the axial dipole of the oxygen has a marked effect on the
configuration of the dumbbell. For
example, a copper hydroxide molecule [Cu(OH)2] is flanked by 2 OH groups,
each of which consists of an
oxygen spiral with a hydrogen triangle (composed of 3 quarks) floating
over
each end; these two OH's stand on
opposite sides of the copper main body.
The effect of the forces from the ends of the oxygens in this
configuration is to repel and displace the funnels on each end of the
copper,
into a shape like an oriental fan or peacock tail, standing straight
out like a
Mohican haircut, on each end of the copper. This funnel displacement
takes
place, even after the forces at the ends of the oxygens have been
mediated and
toned down by the hydrogen groups.
The
published illustration of Cu(OH)2 in Occult Chemistry doesn't do
it justice. Leadbeater and Besant early on
gave up trying
to show things in 3-D, and settled for simple 2-D diagrams of the
elements. The oxygens are not really in
the plane of the fan as depicted, even though described that way in the
text,
written by Jinarajadasa, who was describing the illustration rather
than the
atomic structure. The plane connecting
the two oxygen cylinder axes is actually perpendicular to the copper's
funnel-fan plane.
When
gold meets an O6
complex,
something of like nature occurs to its funnels.
As they approach, the O6
and gold polarly align, and the gold
dumbbell slips into the center
of the hexagonal O6
cell, which
enlarges somewhat to accommodate the gold.
Like flowers held in the blast of a jet engine exhaust, the
funnels at
each end of the gold then stand straight out, along the main axis of
this
complex, under the powerful combined action of the forces emanating
from the
ends of the synchronized oxygens.
The
6 oxygens each contain counter-rotating spirals. These
all come into phase lock when an O6
molecule forms, so that all 12 spirals are rotating in a
synchronous fashion in the molecule, speaking in regards to the
rotational
phase relationships of the main charge carriers, which are uniformly
located,
one per turn, on the helix of each spiral.
This intra- molecular phase resonance is responsible for the
great power
of the O6 group, which
thus exceeds the sum of its parts in its oxidizing potential. As can be seen, physical structure has a lot
to do with atomic interaction and bonding potentialities.
With
the funnels of an O6-embraced
gold
dumbbell standing straight out, it at this point has precisely the same
super-
deformed physical configuration as a dumbbell in high spin. This then,
constitutes the basis of the mechanism responsible for the formation of
Cooper
pairing, and genesis of the ORMEs state, that occurs from exposing
specific
elements to high energy ozone. A very
similar process occurs when bars family elements are exposed to O6. For
compounds such
as gold chloride, there are additional complexities, but in general
terms,
basically the same type of phenomena occurs.
The
highly dipolar nature of this complex is what lies behind, and is
responsible
for, the magnetic properties of ozonated ORMEs (or ORMEs di-ozonides)
and their
salts. There are a number of variations
to the structure I've just described. For example, the O6 group acquires hydrogen ions to
form hydroxyl groups
(similar to those of copper hydroxide, described earlier) when in water.
The
propensity for the an ozone-gold complex to deposit gold on carbon, and
its
attraction to hydrocarbons such as grease and gasoline, is nothing more
than an
expression of the disposition of these materials to oxidize, and the
affinity
of the O6 in such an
ORMEs complex for them. The appetite of
the O6 is hardly
satiated by the gold dumbbell, and it is eager to find something else
more
reactive to bond to.
Even
the tetroxides of platinum group elements
like Ru and
Os are relatively volatile, and the di-ozonides are even more volatile. When di-ozone is combined with salt complexes
of these metals, the resultant compound is more stable, but is still
anxious to
be elsewhere, as soon as it gets a chance. For instance, in aqueous
solution,
volatility increases due to dissociation.
Following
laws of partial pressure and osmotic diffusion, volatized ORMEs (fully
capable
of tunneling), will ignore barriers to other molecules, and go to where
the
closest, most attractive reactants are, following the path (as they see
it) of
least resistance: straight through into the gas tank, the crankcase,
and the
grease spots on the floor. The more
combustive energy a substance has, the more the di-ozone portion will
be
attracted to it.
When
the oxygens have reached their destination, they may or may not abandon
the
ORME they are attached to. There is a
wide range of events that could happen at this point.
But as you have seen, in some cases metal
will be deposited, and some ORMEs will also remain, gelling
the material. The absorption of
"gold gas", or di-ozone-ORMEs complex into
silica gel, which has a natural affinity for ozone, is based on the
same
principle; its affinity for di-ozone is greater still, in proportion to
the
increased O6 reactivity.
When
kept in solution in a beaker as di-ozone ORMEs complexes, when they
leave the
liquid phase at the fluid interface, they do not go straight up into
the
atmosphere above the liquid, but depart from the liquid along a vector
which is
dependent on their departure velocity vector, and this vector is random
through
a 180 degree umbrella. Because of the
pseudo two dimensional interface between the container and the liquid,
this
will naturally tend to be an area where significant migration activity
occurs. Because of this, the number of
ORMEs exiting along or immediately near the edges of the glass
container will
be greater than for any other part of the liquid surface.
It is also obvious that particles exiting in
this region will tend to strike the inner wall of the container, just
at or
above the liquid level, since a large number of their possible
departure
vectors will point them at that region, for that exit zone, around the
edge
where the liquid/container interface or meniscus is.
Some
percentage of the ORMEs hitting this region of the inner container wall
will
tunnel, rather than rebound. Should the
tunneling ORMEs deozonate, as a result of local conditions in the
amorphous
structure of the glass, than the resulting gold atom will become stuck
there,
and its "appearance" will result in a localized stress riser, as a
dislocation in the glass structure.
After enough of these stress dislocations have accumulated in
the same
region, the glass will crack. In this
case it cracks in a nice clean ring.
Tunneling
was occurring in other parts of Jim's glass beaker walls also, but this
was
taking place at random locations, so the points of added stress were
spread out
and more-or-less evenly distributed. Hence no cracking anywhere else.
Glass containers should not be used to store
ORMEs solutions for prolonged periods.
The
solid/liquid transition Jim observed, depending on the presence of
ambient
light is very interesting. This is a
phase change, or mesophase, between a 3D
crystal
lattice and 2D liquid crystal. While
liquid crystals are thermotropic, this is
in fact a
phototropic mesophase change, mediated by
the change
in lattice binding energy from just ambient photons at frequencies
matching the
absorption spectra of the material. I
have been considering and investigating possible karmic pathways which
could
enable discussions to be presented on ORMEs subjects of immediate
interest. These include the further
discussion of subjects related to the formation of ORMEs produced by
Jim's
patented ozone technology; on the numerous important observations of
ORMEs
phenomena you have related; on means of separating partial ORMEs from
one
another according to Cooper pairing levels; on other phenomena reported
by DH
which have as yet only been described in terms fitting his
understanding, which
is largely grounded in conventional (though certainly up to date)
scientific
views of atomic theory; and a number of other areas.
There
is 6 inches of string to bridge two points 10 inches apart. Either the string must be made longer, the
points brought closer, or some of both.
The string is the karmic cost of the knowledge, and the span is
the
knowledge gap to be bridged. The
prospects look good that this can be done.
I
encourage you to continue to actively pursue a course that will remove
those
obstacles. Continue the active exchange
and brokerage of information. Continue
looking for a way to obtain
Anything
you can do to augment the flow of additional knowledge into the
equation from
sources such as yourself, Jim, or your other contacts and associates,
will
allow, and lead to, expanded scope of discussions, and interpretive
explanations to promote your understanding. Keep up your efforts, Barry. The karma of this thing is beginning to melt
like the wicked witch after Dorothy dowsed her.
Dissolution
in acids may occur with partial ORMEs; a sample may be *nothing but*
partial
ORMEs and still completely dissolve in acid. Whether partials will
dissolve in
acids depends on the particular element involved, the degree of
partiality, and
the energy flowing through the paired valence circuits.
You and Hudson presently lack means of
quantitatively determining either of these last two parameters. You can use acid to eliminate partial content
from your samples. But there are other
considerations. Acids may also react
with the oxygens in ORMEs-di-ozonides, with deleterious consequences,
as
explained in a moment.
You
must be careful to properly distinguish the differences between sample
types.
There are several very distinct materials, which must be differentiated
between
if you wish to avoid problems.
Sample
Approx. Color
1
ORMEs
[white]
2
Partial ORMEs
[from gray to white]
3
Partial ORME compounds (salts)
[wide variations]
4
ORME di-ozonides
[*white]
5
Partial ORME di-ozonides
[*varies, typ. gray-white]
6
Partial ORME di-ozonide compounds
[wide variations]
*
Presumed colors
Copper
is an exception, its partial colorations also reflecting the natural
copper-red, in lesser degrees of partiality (2 & 5).
The material Jim is collecting in his traps
is 1, 2, and 3. The other materials,
made by Jim from metals, or from ozonating
trap
material or chemical compounds are 4, 5, and 6.
As
you can see from the above table, the fact that Hudson remains
unconvinced of
the existence of partial ORMEs, as well as lacking familiarity with
di-ozonides, is not particularly important from a color standpoint
(criteria
#1). But the presence of oxygen in the complex can alter the expected
results,
depending on the chemical processes (etc.) samples are subjected to.
The
reasons for this may perhaps help guide Jim toward fruitful directions
of
experimentation.
There
are essentially two ways that an ORME-di-ozonide
can
lose its oxygens, to become a "normal" (ie de-ozonated) ORME. The O6
can come off,
just as it got on, by slipping off one end of the dumbbell or bars
element. It is like a girl slipping a
continuous circular bracelet off her wrist.
But doing this exposes the funnels or bars on the exiture
end of the ORME to powerful disrupting forces from the O6 molecule as it departs, and
often causes Cooper pairs to be
broken during the separation process.
This is its favored way of coming off in many chemical
processes, in the
absence of other factors.
The
other means of losing the oxygens is for the O6 complex to open up, like a
hinged bracelet, so they come
off without passing over the end of the ORME within.
The O6 breaks
apart
and comes off in pieces, in either O3
or O2 molecules. This is
much less likely to disrupt any Cooper pairing that is present; the
captive
ORME will then most likely still continue to be an ORME, after it is
freed from
the oxygens that were girdling it.
In
many of the operations Jim has used to remove the oxygens, "pinning"
the ORME, as you are terming it, the transformation into a metallic or
partially metallic state (low order partial ORME) is actually the
result of the
oxygens blowing apart the Cooper pairing as they slide off, going after
carbon
for example, rather than chemical destabilization of the ORME's paired
valencing. Once one end of a gold ORME's
Cooper pairing is ruptured in this way, energy transients inside the
atom often
blow apart those funnel pairings on the other end as well, as the
remaining
valence circuits attempt to (often impossibly)
assume
a greater amount, or in some cases to maintain the entirety, of the
atom's
Meissner flux by themselves. It appears
that stages of
Jim
has noted that ozonated ORMEs seem to represent a metastable state, and
this is
why. Some processes remove the oxygen in
a way that breaks the Cooper pairing, ending in a metal.
Others remove the oxygen, in a manner so as
to typically leave the ORME intact, which then, of course, shows itself
very
inert and recalcitrant to any further chemical manipulations,
typical of ORMEs David Hudson has been working with.
There
are some other factors which are important, and may be of help. You
have
learned that, because the di-ozone complex is highly dipolar, (as you
have
repeatedly observed first-hand with your various magnet experiments), it is susceptible to alignment and orientation
by an
external field. By aligning the O6/ORMEs complex with a polarizing
field perpendicular to an
electric field, the oxygens may be broken off and removed, laterally. I
suggest
approaching this by applying the electric field in an aqueous
electrolytic
cell, with a perpendicular magnetic field.
Fully
paired ORMEs do not react chemically, except as in the case of O6 and some other unusual
constructs. You may reasonably conclude
that the ORMEs
involved in
Anyone
duplicating
Wrapping
an O6 around an
ORME charges it just fine, in just about the twinkling of an eye. I might go so far as to say it is the Ne Plus Ultra method for ORMEs formation; at
least it is
the key first step in the process. It is
getting the O6 off
again
without trashing everything that I have been gradually and gently
leading your
attentions towards.
Charging
an ORMEs system is different than charging
ORME atoms
individually, but there are some similarities and carry over, when
individually
charged atoms are combined into contiguity.